According to this quiz, I am a center-left social liberatarian. That is a mouthful.
My Political Views
I am a center-left social libertarian
Left: 2.93, Libertarian: 6.65
Political Spectrum Quiz
Check it out if you haven't already. Post your results.
Another quiz gave me a similar result, saying I would likely fit in with Democrats. What an odd personal paradigm shift this is in the course of a few years.
Conservative/Progressive score: 11
Capitalist Purist/Social Capitalist score: 6
Libertarian/Authoritarian score: 2
Pacifist/Militarist score: 4
Disclaimer: These are just quizzes. Have fun.
What's identical to marriage? Oh yeah, marriage.This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.
I feel sorry for American Christians right now. The diva Carrie Prejean is continually being trotted out by the media as some sort of admirable representative of Christian values, all while her behavior and sordid past continue to expose her as the spoiled, self serving, immature, hypocrite she is. As a nonreligious member of society, I am ashamed and disappointed that segments of our culture are promoting and supporting this bimbo, but were I a Christian, I would be pissed at how she is being paraded around as a champion of "Christian family values."
For those who do support this woman, it is obvious their agenda has nothing to do with preserving Christian values, as she is, by their definitions, a sexual deviant. Sure she has been apologizing for posing nude and (evidently) masturbating on camera, but her sincerity is questionable. Are we to believe, in light of her behavior, she has honestly changed so much since her sexual escapades two years ago? For those who love her, though, her time spent in amateur porn is irrelevant. They do not truly care about preserving their sacred values so much as they care about promoting bigotry, and she unapologetically pursues that cause. So long as she is willing to feed people their xenophobic Kool-Aid, they will cheer her and call it "sexual morality."
Prejean needs to grow up. She needs to admit that she is an adult, and as an adult she made some decisions to engage in sexual behavior that violates the societal status quo—even though most everyone is involved in that sort of thing in one way or another, either as participants or spectators. She should not apologize for engaging in that behavior because she does not owe us an apology. She did nothing wrong in her erotic escapades, except at the point where she began touting her Christianity as if Biblical sexual morality is something she values. Be consistent, Prejean, and admit that you are not sorry for what you did and that homosexuals should not be sorry for what they do. Join us in the 21st century if you dare.
I will not hold my breath, though, as I imagine she will continue to fight for that false moral high ground alongside Bill Donahue, Ray Comfort, and Monica Dennington.
I remember a time not so long ago when educational television was legitimately educational and easy to find. TLC, History Channel, and The Discovery Channel were all running respectable and entertaining programming which could effectively scratch the curious itch of those of us who woke up and decided we wanted to learn something that day. Well those days sometimes seem long gone.
TLC was the first to go. Its demise was set in stone as soon as it began running that horrible program Trading Spaces. Soon they were running marathons of the runaway hit and looking to find more programming to appeal to the interior decorating audience. Before long the entire line up of educational programming was abandoned for shows about wedding planning, gardening, home decorating, and fashion. At least they had the good sense to stop calling themselves "The Learning Channel" once their network ceased to have any educational value.
A greater crime, however, began when the History channel began to cater almost exclusively to the "old men over fifty" [note] demographic. Where the network once covered a plethora of historical topics, ranging from Egyptology to biographies to American history, the channel became almost exclusively focused on war. The network incessantly aired hours upon hours of television about Vietnam, Korea, and the Civil and World Wars, occasional taking a breath to address Desert Storm and the Alamo. Once their new audience was well established, they trotted out some Biblical shows which also appealed to the narrow demographic. This set the stage for the apocalyptic programming as the Bible's Book of Revelation was paralleled with the "prophecies" of Nostradamus and Mayan astrology. Now the History Channel has a bit of a broader scope than just war, but it is a scope filled with 2012 alarmism, Bible code quackery, and Shroud of Turin pseudoscience. There is very little if any authentic information to be had here, but it overflows with bad information, enough to satiate even the most voracious conspiracy theorist or homeopath.
The Discovery Channel thankfully has maintained a degree of integrity, and its sister channel Discovery Health has some pretty good programming as well, but as time goes on and I see more and more pseudoscience creeping into the network, I fear its fall may inevitable. The crap continues to draw ratings.
Unfortunately, we are left with only National Geographic, PBS, a teetering Discovery Channel, and an occasional piece from Animal Planet. This may sound like a lot, but PBS is not a dedicated educational network, and National Geographic is not too widely available. It is very common for me to look through the channel guide searching for something compelling and educational only to come up empty.
Well, it seems my woes will only grow from here. If the backwards hogwash program Ghost Hunters has taught us anything, pseudoscience and the paranormal sell, and people will bend over backwards to avoid employing their critical thinking skills if it means they can continue to believe hauntings are real and the frauds at Ghost Hunters know how to find them. I had the misfortune of learning from Skepticblog today—all love to them, of course—that a new network entirely dedicated to "investigating" paranormal activity will launch soon. The Paranormal Television Network will be entirely dedicated to feeding the confirmation biases of the gullible masses who fail to ask themselves basic questions or bother investigating the legitimacy of the claims to which they are so dedicated. If there is one thing we need in more of in our society, it is superstition.
People have been saying for years that television is mind-rotting cesspool, and I think the prophecy is becoming self fulfilling. It is truly not the fault of the networks, though. No, they have to air what draws in ratings, and when the masses demand nonsense, nonsense they will get while those of us on the fringe who care enough to think critically leave to find other venues of intellectual stimulation.
That may have come off a bit snobbish, but I do not care. People need to learn how to think!
The Leonid Meteor Shower [1] [2] happens tomorrow, and I am stranded in a big city doing school work. This would have been a great opportunity to pull out the telescope, but alas, my other obligations do not permit me to do so.
The best time for gazing is between 2 A.M and 4 A.M. EST. I will try to look up through the city lights in hopes of seeing something. I can occasionally make out stars in Atlanta when the temperature is sufficiently low, so perhaps I will see some of the Leonid shower through the bright city lights.
NASA has a peak visibility report available if you want to take a look.
Update: I tried to take a look last night, but it was a lost cause. The city lights were so bright I could distinctly see clouds at 2 A.M. in the morning. Besides that, I could make out Orion and a few bright stars but no meteors. I did not stand out too long, though, as I am still recovering from the flu.
While Manny Pacquiao versus Miguel Cotto was the fight I most wanted to see, I did not have the money to shell out for the event, so I opted to watch the free UFC 105 event instead. From what I have read of the Pacquiao-Cotto fight, Manny dominated once again to a referee stoppage early in the 12th round, earning him a world title in his seventh weight class. Without doubt, Pacquiao is the man in boxing right now, and I frankly will take him any day over his obstinately unlikeable predecessor, Floyd "Money" Mayweather, Jr. It is no wonder Ring Magazine recently gave Pacman straight A's in talent, achievement, marketability, support system, and growth potential. If boxing fans ever get the dream fight they crave between Pacquiao and Mayweather, I will be pulling for Manny and his devastating left hook until the end.
UFC 105 was a reasonable event for a free show, though I think the atmosphere was a little weak compared to most events since it lacked a title fight. I also was not personally invested in any of the fights, but the card had some competitive and exciting bouts.
Britain's favorite son, Michael Bisping, picked up the win over Dennis Kang despite nearly getting his clock cleaned in the first round. I imagine he is happy to bounce back after getting knocked out in devastating fashion by Dan Henderson at UFC 100, though he probably still has a lot of work to do before he convinces American fans he is the real deal. Bisping versus Kang took Fight of the Night honors.
Mike Swick versus Dan Hardy proved a rather brutal bout with Swick frequently on the defense and appearing on the verge of collapse several times. Hardy did not overcome Swick's tenacity with an early finish, but walked away with a convincing unanimous decision victory nonetheless.
In the main event, Randy Couture took the W over Brandon Vera. Vera exploded on Couture in the first few seconds of the opening round and later nearly finished him with two powerful knees. Couture bounced back, though, and fought a strategic fight against the cage that the fans seemed not to appreciate, though I did not mind. Couture needed this win, as he lost the two bouts before this one. He has certainly aged better than his greatest (and significantly younger) rival, Chuck Liddell, but Couture appears a faded fighter at this point. That he managed to defeat Vera at this stage in his career is a true testament to his talent and ability, but I am skeptical that he will ever be a real contender as either a heavyweight or light heavyweight ever again, especially while fighters such as Brock Lesnar (heavy - get well soon, Brock), Lyoto Machida (light heavy), Mauricio Rua (light heavy), and Anderson Silva (sometimes light heavy) are around. I would not go so far as to count him completely out yet, as it was not so long ago that he reigned as champion in a division filled with men who dwarfed him in size, but I think another title reign for Couture is unlikely.
UFC 106 is next week, and I may or may not watch it depending on my friends' plans. Griffin and Ortiz will likely deliver a veritable "slobberknocker" which I am sure fans will appreciate. Other than that, we have The Ultimate Fighter: Heavyweights finale on December 5 to look forward to, as well as the anticipation of the announcement of the next Pacquiao fight, so fight fans have plenty to keep their eyes on these coming weeks.
on My Political Alignment